19th March 2017

aha144 vs WR

 
No updates pending
The purpose of this page is to offered a more accurate explanation of some of  WR’s teachings. I understand that as new insights unfold, the new perspective often necessitates a review of previously documented ideas. I am not sure if WR had the time to do this, particularly when changes to an entire hardcopy draft might be required. As a supporter of his efforts I must address some of the  ‘out of sync’ issues.

WR teaches that there is only two types of motion. There is the centripetal compression which generates heat and density in towards a central hub, and there is centrifugal expansion which redistributes any accumulated potential radially back to the rim source. From these two directions of motion the entire universe can be constructed as pulsing two-directional wave forms.
However, on page 131 of  ‘Atomic Suicide’, WR suggests an alternate mechanism for the generation of heat and density which is at odds with the centripetal/centrifugal model.
He suggests that when a copper wire is coiled into a series of loops with a common focal shaft, that heat and density generates in the direction of that shaft because the loops of force surrounding the coiled wire are fanned, being in closer proximity on the inside and further apart to the outside !

Fig : 1

Fig : 2

Fig : 3

Fig : 3 represents WR’s argument. As the wire is coiled the loops do indeed change their alignment and geometry and there is an increased heating effect towards the central of the wire coil. I do not support however, WR’s explanation as to why this increase heat and density is achieved when electric wire is coiled into tighter and tighter spiral rings.
This image implies there is some distance between the rims of opposite rings, and heating seems to be achieved by the close (fanned)
proximity of the lower rims of neighbouring loops !
We know that the loops (which are fields) do indeed extend sufficiently so that the rims interact and distort to flatten (rims) like two balloons pushed together creating the observed magnetic circuit field lines.
I think WR is wrong to suggest that increased heating/density is achieved simply by the loops POINTING to a common focal point as indicated in fig : 2.    🙁

This is a section from page 135 of the Universal One. It contains a significant typographical error highlighted below.

On the contrary, all of the conditions precedent to the appearance of decreasing ability of mass to attract and to repel have the eight opposite effects in common. These are  decreasing  centrifugal preponderance, pressure, temperature, speed of revolution and negative discharge, and increasing volume, area of orbit and speed of rotation.
In any mass the greater its speed of revolution, the greater its power to attract and to repel.
In any mass the greater its speed of rotation, the less its power to attract and to repel.

The paragraph should read

On the contrary, all of the conditions precedent to the appearance of decreasing ability of mass to attract and to repel have the eight opposite effects in common. These are  increasing  centrifugal preponderance, pressure, temperature, speed of revolution and negative discharge, and increasing volume, area of orbit and speed of rotation.
In any mass the greater its speed of revolution, the greater its power to attract and to repel.
In any mass the greater its speed of rotation, the less its power to attract and to repel.

The confusion arises because increasing centrifugal preponderance DECREASES the pressure and temperature. It may be better to rewrite the entire paragraph as follows…

On the contrary, all of the conditions precedent to the appearance of decreasing ability of mass to attract and to repel have the eight opposite effects in common. These are increasing centrifugal preponderance, which lowers the pressure, temperature, speed of revolution and negative discharge, and increases the volume, area of orbit and speed of axial rotation.
In any mass the greater its speed of revolution, the greater its power to attract and to repel.
In any mass the greater its speed of rotation, the less its power to attract and to repel.

This is a section from page 138 of the Universal One. It contains a significant typographical error highlighted below.
The preponderance of one of the opposites of motion is, therefore, the condition which must be present in mass in order that it may be preponderant in its ability either to attract or to repel.
Substance, then, merely appears to attract or to repel, and that appearance is relative.
Both forces are equal. A preponderance of one is balanced in its opposite by a preponderance of the other. The two, added together, cause an appearance of stability which is maintained, for a time, by motion.
The relative ability of a substance to attract and to repel is in the same ratio as the increase or de-crease of the opposing pressures and other dimensions which determine the potential of a charging or discharging system.
In any mass the apparent ability to attract increases with increase of positive charge and decrease of volume; also the apparent ability to repel increases with increase of negative discharge and  decrease  of volume.


The paragraph should read
The preponderance of one of the opposites of motion is, therefore, the condition which must be present in mass in order that it may be preponderant in its ability either to attract or to repel.
Substance, then, merely appears to attract or to repel, and that appearance is relative.
Both forces are equal. A preponderance of one is balanced in its opposite by a preponderance of the other. The two, added together, cause an appearance of stability which is maintained, for a time, by motion.
The relative ability of a substance to attract and to repel is in the same ratio as the increase or de-crease of the opposing pressures and other dimensions which determine the potential of a charging or discharging system.
In any mass the apparent ability to attract increases with increase of positive charge and decrease of volume; also the apparent ability to repel increases with increase of negative discharge and  increase  of volume.

This is a section from page 168 of the Universal One. It contains a significant typographical error highlighted below.
It is probably an error introduced by the publishers/editors.

The desire of electricity is to accumulate mass toward the north.
The desire of magnetism is to dissipate mass toward the south.
Electricity attempts the expression of its desire for action by opposing inertia and ends in non-motion of its speed-time dimension at the ultimate gravitative centers of all masses and systems. This effect is counterbalanced however, by its opposite effect of increased speed of revolution in power-time dimension.
Magnetism attempts the expression of its desire to suppress motion through opposing it, and ends in expressing great motion at the equators and ecliptic areas of all masses and systems. This effect is, in its turn, also counterbalanced by its opposite effect of  increased speed of revolution in power-time dimension. 

The centripetal (Electric) motion in the direction of north is denoted as a retarding of the axial rotation with the counterbalance being an increase in the speed of orbital revolution. Long days and short years. This is the expression for POWER/time.
Centrifugal (Magnetic) motion in the direction of south is denoted by increased orbital paths (slow transition hence – long years) and fast axial rotation implying short days. This is the expression for SPEED/time.

The paragraph should read

Magnetism attempts the expression of its desire to suppress motion through opposing it, and ends in expressing great motion at the equators and ecliptic areas of all masses and systems. This effect is, in its turn, also counterbalanced by its opposite effect of  increased axial speed of rotation in speed-time dimension. 

This is a section of page 176 from The Universal One. This section contains two contradictory statements, one of which is incorrect or indeed both are incorrect. 

The ability of each to discharge and to repel lessens with the lowering of its potential position in its system.
Just so with all mass. As its potential is lowered, which means that its polar magnetic bases are enlarged, and its ecliptic expansion is increased, its ability to generate, charge, attract, radiate, discharge and repel is also increased.

 The point of this section is to outline that as radiation proceeds its ability to radiate decreases. This is because further radiation into an ever increasing volume implies a weakening of the centrifugal motion. 

 In my opinion the passage should read as follows…
The ability of each to discharge and to repel lessens with the lowering of its potential position in its system.  CORRECT.  

Just so with all mass. As its potential is lowered, which means that its polar magnetic bases are enlarged, and its ecliptic expansion is increased, its ability to generate, charge, attract, radiate, discharge and repel is also  DECREASED .