Political Correctness

Political Correctness

If the principle advocated by WR are true then, those same principles can be applied to every aspect of our lives. This is an electric universe. Electricity is the force which keeps opposite expressions polarised and separated into pairs. This is Natural Law. This is how the universe works, and this is how the electrical universe is constructed.


Yes, it is indeed true that all is One. Source is the only ‘thing’ that has any real existence, and this physical electrical polarised universe is the product of a Thinking Mind wishing to express Cosmic Ideas.
If the technique utilised by Source to create physical motion is a polarised division whether it be balanced or unbalanced then it seems reasonable to design our electrical devices in a similar way, to mimic the Creators methods.

If the principle advocated by WR are true then, those same principles can be applied to every aspect of our lives. This is an electric universe. Electricity is the force which keeps opposite expressions polarised and separated into pairs. This is Natural Law. This is how the universe works, and this is how the electrical universe is constructed.
Yes, it is indeed true that all is One. Source is the only ‘thing’ that has any real existence, and this physical electrical polarised universe is the product of a Thinking Mind wishing to express Cosmic Ideas.
If the technique utilised by Source to create physical motion is a polarised division whether it be balanced or unbalanced then it seems reasonable to design our electrical devices in a similar way, to mimic the Creators methods.

This pragmatic approach should also be applied to the structure of the society we need in which to thrive as electric beings. Polarisation is the very technique used by Source to create the multitude of potential differences expressed in opposed pairs to generate this physical electric reality.
Our sensing has been designed to be stimulated by such potential difference. Homogeneity implies an unchanging condition, a loss of a polarised identity.
There is currently an upsurge in a politically progressive ideology. The principle aim of this philosophy is to create a homogeneous society by treating all races and sexes as equal as well as undermining the family unit. This is a recipe for disaster, which is of course the plan. They are not equal by design. The cultural differences between the races should be maintained at all costs to ensure vitalised creative thinking is maintained. Of course, those differences should be celebrated. The push of cultural Marxism by these well-funded progressive groups under the banner of ‘diversity or equality’ work against Natural Law and will eventually depolarise our societies into a lifeless ‘dead’ state just like a spent battery.

Progressive ideology is akin to the effect of radioactive radiation on any polarised condition it contacts. This ideology is designed to destroy creative thinking which will enslave our consciousness to base levels. You know what you have to do – RIGHT ?

A vitalised polarised and generative condition
A diverse condition…coming to a town near you !

6 thoughts on “Political Correctness”

  1. Unity in diversity such at that advocated by the Baha’i teachings for example (I am not proselytizing here), is not a homogenization of cultural differences, as found in Marxist doctrine. What progressive ideologies are you referring to? As long as cultural differences are respected, unifying mankind will not ‘depolarize’ but lead to a synergy of mutual support. What works against such inevitable synthesis is a pervasive trend from what I would term ‘pseudo libertarianism’ (or neo Darwinianism) which is isolationist and naively opens the door to global corporate exploitation, which is responsible for all kinds of havoc currently degrading the planet, culturally and environmentally. What are you implying one should do here?

  2. Right you are, Alan! However, being true to the seeming reality that we are all different and should respect that comes at a great cost. Here is a simple analogy from a family unit level. I, being one who am perfectly comfortable to spend time by myself for long periods has a great advantage in that it allows me to concentrate/decentrate at my own leisure. Alas, I and my wife are now taking care of her aging parents in our home and with that comes another seeming reality. That is, my ‘alone time’ has been taken from me and they are left with the notion that they are not welcome due to my elusive behavior (they expect to be entertained at every turn and, unknowingly, attempt to enforce their domestic [basic] thinking upon my person to the point of conflict). Must I conform to this restricted level of behavior to preserve peace? Is that love? Or are they better served by my living example of having attained a higher level of cosmic thinking? After all, spending alone time with MIND is how we get there. But Walter Russell made no bones about the “giving and re-giving” process that we must all follow as that is also part of the natural law. Well, I’ve heard it said that one can be so heavenly-minded that they are of no earthly good. Was Walter Russell serious when he said that we (we being the ones who are aware) are the light of the world? I think that anyone who is aware and daily engaged in the giving and re-giving process must practice a considerable amount of patience with those who are not. And I think that that is the answer to your question. RIGHT? Shedding light on the seeming evils of political correctness starts at home. I once said to my son upon his heated reaction to my seemingly intolerable action, “Thank God there is only one of me in the world!” I am convinced that higher levels of awareness are gifts of grace. That is not to say that we sit on our duffs and wait for God to hand it to us. As Walter Russell said, “God will work with us and not for us”. Maybe we (we who are aware) should all get together and figure out how to fight it. Wait a minute! Did I just call the kettle black?

  3. I think the correct interpretation of WR theory is that fear (psychological separation and isolation) depolarizes, so any political ideology that reinforces fear and division is depolarizing. The unification of mankind through harmonious interactions is certainly regenerative, not depolarizing. Of course unification by force or imposed top-down by corporate or corporacratic or facist (merging corporate and governmental) political systems, is fear-based and hence depolarizing. As John Keely pointed out, matter aggregates by sympathetic harmonious attraction. Allowing that to occur socially means social/democratic systems that support creative individual initiative, but protects against exploitation from unbalanced profit-driven corporate entities that culturally homogenize for profit motives. To state that ‘progressive ideologies’ that promote ‘diversity’ or ‘unity’ are depolarizing sounds suspiciously xenophobic and racist to me.

    • Hi RC, well I am not xenophobic or racist. The article was born from the uncontrolled immigration policy practiced by the EU, the monolithic power structure closest to home. This is definitely a forced influx of economic migrants onto mainland Europe. These people bring with them an ideology that is incompatible with European cultural values. Diversity is pushed as the tool to dilute and fracture. This is a depolarising philosophy. Not too long ago any European wanting to work in Canada, Australia, or the USA would have to jump through hoops to get the appropriate paperwork in order. There are no such restrictions to African migrants now in Europe!
      German and French culture will soon be eroded away. You are correct that fear is a great controller of one’s mind. This is used very effectively to demonise and silence any dissenting voices. What appears to be happening is that group flood a country, don’t assimilate then they want the host country to morph into their homeland. I hear that 43% of Californian families don’t speak English at home … probably already too late !

  4. Look, at least the 43% of Californians who don’t speak English @ home are usually hispanics, not the feared muslims of current US President. I dread what has happened in Marseilles, France. Absolument terrible.

Leave a comment