In this two-way electric universe Birth = Death (50 : 50).
They are the same condition both present simultaneously. To fully grasp the two-way motion and the potential implication for device design, consider the following model.

At the birth of every condition there is an equal probability (50 :50) to develop a dominant A or B character, male or female in one direct or another.
The environment may also play an important role in determining which direction is initiated.
If femaleness develops then character B increases to 60 AND character A is turned down to 40. While female character is dominant it is not without male traits at this early stage of development. No physical trait or property is of/by itself alone. It is two. One half of the overall character is turned up to express dominance while the other half is turned down to express the passive qualities. Torque/Speed, Centripetal/Centrifugal, Inhalation/Exhalation all interchange their individual dominance during the entire cycle.

A positively charging body (70%) is also 30% discharging. Every anode is a cathode and every cathode is an anode.
Notice, the cathode has a fully expanded aspect (orbital revolution) AND a fully compressed aspect namely, maximum axial rotation. These interchange – rhythmically.
At the cathode, (a) is dominant while (B) is passive. At the anode, (b) is passive and (A) is dominant.

Creating electrical anodes devoid of their expanded character is not in accordance with WRC principles !!!

4 thoughts on “Sixty-Nine”

  1. Hi. if light does not “move” in itself how do we account for Einsteins apparent fixed speed of light being constrained within the Universe. is this more an effect of consciousness itself? Tesla believed light was neither fixed and could not believe in curvature of space – Einstein believed in curvature of space but without an aether – how can space curve if there is nothing to curve/ Is Russell considering the Universe [ if all matter was removed as a sphere of “nothing”? – what do you make of some of the Flat earther claims? They believe we are on a disc that acts more like a Faraday coil.. Consider Sagnacs experiment [ a continuation of the Michaelson Morley experiment ] that demonstrates the earth is indeed still. [ this experiment was repeated in modern tomes yielding same results ]

    • I understand the apparent fixed speed of light @ 186,000 miles/sec is the maximum rate of human perception in this 3D reality. Speeds of >186,000 miles/sec would only appear = 186,000 miles/sec to our sensing. According to WR. all physical expression is a result of the apparent division of Mind. Division implies curvature of a flat/infinite plane. This is how polarity and all effects of polarity come into being. this curved Mind lies at the centre of all expression to create the positive anode and negative cathode condition each side of that curved plane. Likewise, surrounding that centre hub the rim limit is also curved to act like a reflector so that a wave can be generated within the wavefield. A musical string must be secured at its extremes in order to generate the standing wave.
      At present, I cannot find any synergy between WRC and the flat earth model.
      Perhaps the subscribers can offer an insight !

  2. The speed of light is not fixed, it was “fixed”-not for the benefit of science-“as though Nature was no longer necessary for the study of Nature, and in fact it just gets in the way!” ~Terrence McKenna.

    They “defined” the speed of light in 1972 despite experimental evidence indicating a variable data set, over decades, claiming it was a limitation of experimental equipment, which would be assumed to be a cluster around a value rather than the reality Terrence McKenna (recruited by CIA to shut him up) claims it was speeding up.

    • My understanding is the speed of light appears fixed due to the limit of our perception of our physical reality. It is like an internal limit rather than an external one 👍

Leave a Comment