This page was last updated on Nov. 28, 2013.
The purpose of this page is to discuss some of the Walter's diagrams. As mentioned earlier some of Walter's drawings are multi layered and it can be difficult to determine which parts are simultaneous and which are sequential.
Drawing # 1
I just want to mention one issue with this drawing for the moment, and that is the
incorrect (imho) positioning of the wave apex on the right hand side.
It is my present understanding that the wave apex should be relocated to the diagonal opposite highlighted blue.
The left hand portion of the image displays diagonal orientation, but the right one does not !!!
Answers please on a postcard to...
Drawing # 2
I have come to appreciate that this is probably Walter's most insightful drawing. This image is the blueprint for EVERY single expression within the simulations. It is so easy to glance over this drawing in a cursory way and accept what is depicted. With Walter's work though, cursory glances are not sufficient to gain inner knowledge. It is often necessary to sit and interrogate yourself with questions regarding all aspects of what is shown. For example, from where does the light of Mind emanate, and what does that mean for a 40 year old female body or a galaxy?
Where are the lenses, or the cubic wavefield boundaries?
The answers may not at first trip off the tongue, but this type of deep meditation and contemplation is exactly what is required to gain the inner knowledge offered by Walter's teachings.
Diagram #3
For all the same reasons as diagram # 1 above.
Diagram #4
Walter uses the term 'black hole' to describe the location during cycle 1 where the positive manifestation will occur during cycle 3.
If you can imagine our sun oscillating every few seconds rather than every hundred billion years, the sun would then be observed appearing sequentially in two locations as the wave oscillated above and below the horizontal axis.
This image suggests that vibration of any matter within the simulation follows the same principles as a string on a musical instrument.
A problem may students find confusing is the common image of division which suggests that this image depicts SIMULTANEOUS action/reaction.
In order to follow the concept of a vibrating string matter must FIRST express in one direction and THEN in the opposite direction.
Diagram #5
Over the years I have come to loath this image and all it is supposed to represent.
This diagram, combined with the vagueness of the explanations in Walter's texts have caused me much frustration. I even find it difficult to devote time to explaining why this image on one hand is ok, but on the other is so misleading.
Suffices it here to say, using the above image please explain how we can collect Lithium metal in isolation from Fluorine ?
This time your answer won't fit on a (diagram #1) postcard !!!
It follows on from the issue highlighted in diagram # 4. It is often promoted that the idea of generic man is divided into male and female, which it is, but the image above is also promoted as the representation of that division.
This implies that a wave function will then follow which I cannot find any examples of within the simulation.
My own work has revealed to me that nature's waves are better represented by
a left/right divide rather than the up/down divide 
Diagram #6 (under construction)
This is Walter's version of the periodic table of elements. Based on some the information offered by WR can we fit this image into the overall wave model ?
Some points to consider
- there are 3.5 unsensed/unknown octaves below the carbon octave
- carbon is the most vital element
- elements after carbon are unwinding
If these points are combined into a single drawing they would then look something like this.
Diagram #7
It is my present understanding that the correct way to read the flow in the following image is a 'head on' type flow which is defined by the curved plane of zero curvature.
rather than what is possibly generally believed...
Compression is FROM the outside inwards.
Imagine the beginning of the universal simulation when only one single polarity cell existed.
Sure, it is divided into positive and negative. It has to be in order to create a polarity differential, however this SINGLE cell is not capable of reproduction and is therefore not an expression of male and female.
Let's call this single cell Lithium. Lithium is thus expressed as a defined mix of both positive and negative polarities.
EVERY expression within the simulation has dual polarity, which is not male and female rather it is positive and negative. Lithium is not half Fluorine !!!
The expression for male is both positive and negative, but so to is the expression of female both positive and negative.
Fluorine is also a defined combination of positive and negative polarities.
Any conical expression is not a division of male and female character rather it is an expression of positive and negative character.
This clarification is required because through out Walter's writing the concepts of negative and female are often mixed up and interchanged together. This can be very confusing for a student to follow Walter's intended themes.
With only one single polarity cell in existence, the idea of creation cannot continue. In order for the creation idea to continue, there must be a union between cells. In other words, male and female express TWO halves of the same idea, each of those halves are sub-divided into positive and negative.
A single cell which is divided into a positive and negative half is by itself NOT capable of reproduction. The conical representation above only indicates a SINGLE cell. It is not male and female as is all too often tauted across the internet.
Two conical halves are required to interact somehow to continue the creation idea. We need a conical expression of Lithium AND a conical expression for Fluorine.
One polarised cell cannot exist by itself !!! What !!
If one cell could be expressed then male would be +ve/-ve and female would thus be expressed as +ve/-ve.
Can you now 'see' why there can be so much apparent confusion ?
Expression is always in pairs, male and female. Each expression (M/F) are each positive and negative.
When male-ness is expressed, male projects its positive half, BUT female projects a negative half.
When female-ness is expressed, female projects its positive side, BUT male projects its negative half.
Think of the expressions as follows...
Male = +ve with -ve and female = +ve with -ve
