Nothing Happens

This page was last updated on June 26, 2015.

If you are not already familiar with much of the teachings of WR then you had better turn back now before you suffer a cognitive malfunction. While the ideas about to be revealed here are not really difficult, they are better appreciated with a sound footing in WRC.

The tools required are few namely,

an understanding of transparent and opaque media
an understanding of plane polarised light, how polarised sunglasses function
wave field motion and the wave field boundary characteristics, the interface between motion/non-motion
clockwise motion (cw) and anti-clockwise motion (acw)

Proposal # 1

One-way or Two-way universe

The one-way view of universal phenomena proposed modern science is best described by reading the time according to fig : 1.

But, when attempting to understand the true nature of the universe according to the teaching of WR then it is better to be aware of the influence of the perspective offered in fig : 1a whereby there is a valid perspective looking one way and an equally valid perspective looking from behind through the transparent clock face in reverse.

(fig : 1)

(fig : 1a)

Proposal # 2

How to make - opaque ?

A transparent lens or indeed any transparent media made be thought of as a medium which allows 100% light to pass through without any resistance to that motion. We know that all motion is spiral and if spiral light is passed through a polarised lens, then the action of that lens will only allow light vibrating in one plane to exit. All polarised sunglasses work on this principle.

(fig : 2)

(fig : 2a)

Fig : 2a indicates when two polarised lens are aligned such that one lens is 90° offset to the other, then no light penetrates through.

Every aspect of WRC indicates 90° offset relationships, inert gas/carbon, male/female, EM observations.

A clear prediction of WRC is that there is also a 90° offset relationship between the observable physical universe and the spiritual universe. A plane of zero curvature is thus defined as a condition whereby plane polarised light is 90° offset and will thus not allow egress/ingress of light to/from the wave field.

Opaqueness is therefore NOT black space. Dark black space is slow motion, while opaqueness is nothingness !

The area within the wave field is thus defined as the arrangement of two opposed planes of polarised light. When the two opposed planes are perfectly parallel, then the light is free flowing across the wave field. The light is 100% translucent, and incandescent.

As these oppose plane move from the parallel towards the ubiquitous 90° relationship that translucency begins to decline until at 90° the wave field is 100% opaque. In other words the wave field turns inside-out. Each condition becoming the other. The once incandescent interior become a wave field boundary and the wave field boundary becomes an incandescent interior.

This 90° offset may be considered as a resistance to light transmittance. That resistance will be recorded in many dimensions, but primarily as heat.

Proposal # 3

Clockwise

Anti-clockwise motion

When observers of an event are offset by 180° they each perceive that same event in reverse. Observer 3 see the clock moving in a clockwise direction, while observer 3b perceives the same motion as an anti-clockwise motion. Needless to say, the mechanism driving the clock has remained unchanged !

(fig : 3)

(fig : 3a)

This phenomenon alone can confuse observers. What might appear as a retrograde rotation of a planet in venus for example, can also be explained by realising the planet is upside down with respect to other observable planets. Upside down-ness can be attributed to the age, the teenage years of a planets life cycle.

Let's assign the clockwise motion of fig : 3 to the forwards progression of time, while the progression indicated in fig : 3a as the backward flow of time.

Proposal # 4

Transparent/Opaque interface

Light between the wave field boundaries behaves as if it is passing through two parallel polarisers. There appears to be 100% transmittance.

At wave field boundaries though, one of those polarised planes is offset by 90° and the light transmittance comes to an abrupt halt.

Light cannot escape from its own wave field because it is plane polarised. Likewise, light cannot enter a wave field for the same reason.

(fig : 4)

Proposal # 5

Backwards flow of Time

Everything is Undone

Life, Vitality & Death

Nothing happens

There appears to be a lot going on in proposal # 5. This is because there is no clear distinction between each of the proposed items.

They really are the same thing, though our senses, and scientific education have done a great job convincing us otherwise !

(fig : 5)

Remember, time is a technique used to measure events. It is a dimension, just like heat or rotation. It has no use other than to record motion in the universe-in-opposition.

Instead of attributing 100% transparency to the front lens let's call that property vitality. When we would have described the motion as 100% translucent we will now call it 100% vital.

Fig : 3 indicates that as any cycle proceeds there are two effects which must be taken into account although our sensing may predominantly respond to one aspect only !

As time passes, the vitality from the front perspective (observer 3 ) is reducing, it must therefore be gaining more of observer 3b's perspective . The properties and characteristics of 3b's are coming to the front ! (fig : 5a)

But, it there really any difference ? Looking through the 'blue 3/4' lens light can only reach the boundary interface. The new section being revealed from 12 - 3 o'clock is not observable anyway. In other words, we don't tend to 'see' death coming at us, we tend to sense this as a loss of vitality, getting older, looking older.

Life is thus composed of more transmittance ability, while death is a condition of opaqueness.

When fig : 5 has the front face and the back face arranged so that they are parallel to one another then we can perceive 'space' through the looking glass so to speak. But, when they orientate themselves with a 90° offset then we can only perceive translucence on one side only. Male physical body for instance. As fig : 5 toggles the clear lens from front to rear as indicated in fig : 5a, everything really loos the same !

Proposal # 6

Male / Female Union

We can now compliment WR teachings and add further clarity to how and why union occurs between opposite pairs of the same one idea.

(fig : 6)

Fig : 6 shows the two possible orientations for translucent/opaque character. It is reasonable to assign that when opposed bodies come together with parallel plane then incandescence is inevitable. If the orientation is anything less than parallel then their shared light will be less than ideal. If their orientation approaches a 90° offset then serious consequences may result.

All is Light

A good example of how a 90° offset of patterned spiral light is as follows.

(fig : 7)

(fig : 7a)

(fig : 7b)

Fig : 7b indicates the wide spread cultural understanding of the 90° offset with respect to light.

Fig : 7 indicates an undisturbed light pattern, while 7b incorporates a spiral disturbance to the inert pattern. The interference pattern creates the illusion of 'atomic' structure which has been observed when tungsten was examined under an electron microscope.