An understanding of the correct geometrical and spatial orientation are necessary to successful coil winding !
Firstly, heads implies looking from the anode towards the cathode while tails implies looking from the cathode towards the anode.
I am not implying that the tail side is a cathode as will be made more clear later.
The anode is located on the reverse side of the cathode, and visa versa. The spiral paths look different, but they are both generative !
We know that when a coin is rolled on its edge, the anode/cathode roll in the same direction.
This is important because all bodies roll on their equatorial edge.
We know also, that our perspective changes what we observe. For example, when the coin is rolled on its edge, the anode may appear to rotate in a clockwise manner, but an observer on the opposite side will ‘see’ the cathode rotate with anti-clockwise motion.
Remember though, each observer is separated by a plane which divides the two perspectives which they do not see !
You will agree that if the coin above was transparent, such that an observer on one side (anode) could see through to the opposite (cathode) side simultaneously one would be sure that compression on the anode side would also be replicated on the cathode side.
So, can we really say the tail side of the coin accurately represents the cathodic condition ?
Planes of symmetry are evident throughout Nature dividing as they do apparent mirror images.
WRC teaches that there is only two types of motion,
centripetal motion which runs from the rim in towards a central hub, and
centrifugal motion, which runs from the central hub back out towards the rim
If what we perceive is indeed transparent then all observers will perceive centripetal motion simultaneously as it occurs. Likewise, those same observers will perceive simultaneously any centrifugal motion as it takes place. Although observers opposite one another will report a CW and an ACW motion for the SAME motion. This effect though is just an illusion of perspective.
Remember, perspective is to the 3D what relativity is to the 4D !
This two-way motion is indicated in fig : 1.
Fig : 1
Please note, although WR does describe this continuous motion on page 278 of ‘Atomic Suicide’ he is however not clear as to whether the effect should be witnessed in its entirety from only the anode perspective as indicated in fig : 1.
This effect is also achieved if the red centripetal is inscribed on the top side of a page which is then flipped over to continue the centrifugal spiral on the reverse side.
The significance of this is, one only observes the compression from the anode perspective, but to observe the expansive cycle requires the page to be flipped over.
If we constructed a geometry with only centripetal motion, it will look as indicated in fig : 2.
No radiative cycle evident !
Fig : 2
Now for the curve ball that confuses everyone !
If fig : 2 represents heads (anode perspective) then the reverse side will look like fig : 3
Fig : 3
Fig : 3 is CENTRIPETAL not centrifugal !
This implies a simultaneous aspect to Creation whereby TWO generative stream are necessary to create matter or form.
The radiative streams of fig : 2 are IDENTICAL to fig : 3 BUT IN THE REVERSE DIRECTION ! See fig : 4.
But, how does the spiral of fig : 3 and that of fig : 4 interact ?
Fig : 2 GENERATION ONLY - CW inwards spiral |
 Fig : 4 RADIATION ONLY - ACW spiral |
The exhaust streams of fig : 4 will push the spiral with ACW motion, and not in the direction indicated by the arrows !!!!
The exhaust is thrusting in one direction but the effect is in the opposite direction, just like a firework !
What does electricity do ? It divides. It pushes the poles as far away from each other as possible and holds them apart until the vitality of the electric effect has dissipated. This implies that when a condition is polarised it is divided into a fig : 2 anode condition
and a fig : 4 cathode condition, not a fig : 2/fig : 3 combination !
A fig : 2/4 combination (polarisation) therefore implies a cone, a polarised cone.
The motion of fig : 1 can now be expressed in reverse as follows.
 Fig : 1 |
 Fig : 5 |
The spiral paths of fig : 1 and fig : 5 are IDENTICAL but are running in the opposite direction. Notice, how the outlet of fig : 1 becomes the input of fig : 5 !
Now, if fig : 1 were extended to complete a full circle it would reveal the following geometry.
Fig : 6
Likewise, a reverse of (fig : 5) the streams would reveal an identical geometry. The template for the ‘flower of life’ geometry.
Fig : 7
The question now emerges, is the following image (fig : 7) comprised of
fig : 1 only, a generative and radiative aspect
fig : 5 only the opposite generative/radiative aspect or
the generative part of fig : 1 and generative part of fig : 5 ?
You’ll need to decide if you want to replicate Nature with electrical coils !
Cosmic Pulse
If we consider figs : 2/3/4 in a more generic way for a moment.
 Fig : 8 |
 Fig : 8a |
Fig : 8 represents the head side of the toroid, looking INTO the anode, while fig : 8a represents the tail side of the same toroid.
When the central hole of the toroid contracts to close, that event is experienced equally from either side. When the central hole dilates both sides experience a dilation.
In order for matter (gold, sodium, hydrogen) to manifest it must be constructed from a two-way Cosmic pulse.
Pulse 1, fig : 8 fires and a centripetal pulse runs from the rim to the hub, which closes the central hole. Then, the accumulated potential runs a centrifugal path from the hub to the rim via fig : 8a.
Pulse 2, fig : 8a fires in reverse and a centripetal pulse runs from the rim inwards towards the central hub, then
that accumulated potential runs a centrifugal path from the hub to the rim via fig : 8.
It is implied that pulse 1 and pulse 2 are sequential. Can pulse 1 and pulse 2 be simultaneous, and if so, what would the effects be ?
By suggesting a sequential aspect to the cycle we are essentially saying that the radiative exhaust of fig : 8, becomes the rim and hence the starting point of the generative cycle of fig : 8a ! Likewise, the exhaust of fig : 8a becomes the starting point for fig : 8.
Can we now say, that a fast oscillation between figs : 8/8a will manifest as a hot, dense solid, while a slow oscillation will manifest as cold nebulosity ?
But, does a slow oscillation imply that fig : 8 or fig :8a is manifest for a longer period of time ?
Fig : 9
Notice, if you fold along the black horizontal line the superimposed images will align appropriately. In terms of male and female bodies we can now assign maleness to sides A/A1 and femaleness to sides B/B1. Both male/female each have a positive generative aspect as well as a radiative expansive aspect.
The orientation of the streams for side A and B1 are identical, but opposite in direction. Likewise, the orientation of the side B streams are identical to side A1 but once again the direction is reversed.
Houston -
we have a problem !
WR is clear, the generative growth pattern begins at expanded cathodes and grows to a compressed apex in a conical geometry. The radiative stream grows from that compressed condition out away from the anode back to the expanded cathode condition.
Nature on the other hand, grows by virtue of expanding phi spirals !
The growth in a phi spiral follows the ‘Fibonacci sequence’ which EXPANDS from 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55…. this is growth through EXPANSION and not compressing towards a compressed apex as suggested by WRC. Every full rotation increase the growth by 6.85 or (growth = 1.618 ^4). In most cases though, Nature never actually grows to this ration deciding instead to limit her ration to values less than 6.85.
How might these apparently conflicting directional theories be reconciled ?
WB Yeats an Irish poets and luminary also investigated the power of the spiral gyre here.