Coil Design

Last Update completed on January 17, 2017
January 17, 2017 : introduction of ‘wobble’ to design
January 11, 2017 : Addition of +/- design
January 10, 2017 : New content added discussing some design considerations. Not to confuse loops of force with wiring

MSS = main stream science

This page is not for the faint hearted and will take you to a place you may wish you hadn’t gone. In order to fully grasp how and why the following is suggested you will have to have had worked your way through the entire site content. Because, the reasons for the following radical proposal are laid out in detail throughout the site.

The design proposal below will focus on the generation of heat rather than transmutation.
Please be aware, this content will make little sense if you have not put sufficient work and contemplation into WRC. You are of course free to design your coils and build your devices in any way you wish. Chances are though, you will be simply retracing a well worn path with disappointing results. You need to approach WRC by suspending your main stream education and embracing aspects of the Creation Idea which are not immediately obvious to your sensing apparatus !
If you intend to simply repeat the design considerations which have been developed before you, then you will probably achieve similar results. WRC offers something different, copy Nature !

This material is offered as an Open-Source resource and should not be coveted by ego !

Tip 1
If you decide to use iron cores at any stage to harness energy as described by WR, then, I urge you to only use SOFT IRON cores.
Soft iron has no magnetic memory and is the core used in electro-magnets because once the current is off the B-field collapses.
Soft iron is prepared as follows…

  • Cut core to desired geometry
  • Prepare a flat bed furnace as you might for a barbecue, and get the bed of coals glowing hot. If possible use a bellows
  • Place the core(s) on the hot coals, ensure they are supported and will not deform while exposed to the heat
  • Cover the cores with a layer of charcoal/coal. The temperature reached should be about 800° C
  • Heat the cores to cherry pink for about 45 minutes
  • Allow the core to cool very slowly, over several days if necessary. The core will not retain a magnetic memory !
  • Sand may be used to cover the cooling embers to ensure a slow cool down of the cores

Since the early days of Michael Faraday, man in his attempt to harness Nature has always wound his coils and solenoids in more or less the same way. Winding copper wire in a spiral fashion around an iron core. This technique has proved very useful in many of man’s activities, albeit performed in a very inefficient manner.
Both WR and Tesla have advocated that electric current does not flow IN a wire, rather it flows around a wire, a skin effect. MSS continues to describe the current as flowing in a wire akin to contrary to the teachings of these great minds.
MSS has no understanding of the importance of ‘dividing gravity’, and has even less understanding of the existence and function of E/W poles.

Fig : 1

Some of the issues with fig : 1

  • the copper coils are wound with uniform diameter, Nature does not use this technique
  • multiplication of potential is achieved but the multiplication is 1 (x 1)
    no allowance for division of gravity
  • coils design fights Nature. A 100% E-field is divided into a 50% E-field and 50% B-field (wasted as magnetic field)
  • a STATIC division is achieved, but a dynamic division is required
  • designers are totally confused over whether to use CW/ACW windings
    copper wire wrapped around iron cores in a N/S direction is the WRONG thing to do
  • no consideration is given to the loops of force nor the orientation of those same loops

Fig : 2

Some of the issues with fig : 2

  • all of Nature’s bodies spin/rotate/revolve or turn on their equatorial rims. The N/S axis is the axle of rotation
  • the loops of force (spherical body) are perpendicular to N/S axis
  • all of man’s electrical devices rotate the armature 90° out of phase with Nature. Man rotates his devices on the E/W axis
  • the importance of two foci over a single focal point is not recognised. The field must wobble. This is why Tesla’s ac is preferred, transformable for man’s needs.

WR teaches that the only motion in the universe is that contained within electrical loops of force. That motion is either contracting sphincter style in a centripetal manner to close the central hole, or expanding in a centrifugal manner to open that central hole. The concentrative effort of Mind controls that motion.

Tip 2
Page 131 of Atomic Suicide
When 100 ft of wire is looped into one large circle and a current passed through it little heat/density will be detected at the center of that large loop. When the same 100 ft is made into 50 loops (smaller diameter) then great heat/density will be evident along the common central shaft.
The diameter of the wire loops determines the measurable activity at the center of the wire loop. Large diameter cathodes will thus appear cold, and nebulous while tightly wound anodes will manifest great heat and density.

Spinning loops of force run 90° to the N/S axis.

Fig : 3

Fig : 3 indicates the circulating loop of force which circulates about a shaft/axle of Stillness. This axle of Stillness IS MIND itself, and the rotating loops are the electrical current manifestation within the physical universe which indicate that Mind is actively Thinking.
Mind manifests within the physical universe as circulating Loops of Electrical Force.We know we can produce circulating electric loops of force about a current carrying wire !!  These loops of force manifest at 90° to the N/S axis !!!
These loops of force are the same loops as those utilised by Mind when Thinking.
This is after all an ELECTRIC universe !

The entire physical universe is made from spinning loops of force as indicated in fig : 3. That’s it, there is no other motion. These loops have a critical central hole diameter. Loops in motion are either closing their central hole, or opening the hole up.That’s it, there is no other motion.
The effect of this simple motion is extremely complex, not helped by our sensing apparatus  !!

Fig : 4

Fig : 5

Fig : 4 Notice, the loops are perpendicular to the N/S direction – this is GOOD ! But, they won’t create a tornado because there is no acceleration between the adjacent loops. They have the same dimension. There is no multiplication from one loop to another.

Fig : 5 – Notice, the loops are perpendicular to the N/S direction – this is GOOD ! These loop lines indicated on the card are NOT magnetic lines of force, rather they are ELECTRIC lines of force. These loops are set in MOTION This motion manifests as CURRENT in the wire !

Figs : 4/5 indicates those loops of force produced around a current carrying wire. These electric loops are analogous to the Thought Loops of Mind. Mind Thinks electrically. When man creates polarity, his efforts are recorded in loops of electrical force to the measure of his efforts. These moving loops of electrical force simulate Mind Thinking that effort into physical existence.
As described, fig : 4 will manifest within the physical universe as 100% E-field, because all the loops are geometrically perpendicular to the N/S direction.
WR has taught us the importance of the ‘division of gravity’ and how that technique is used to bring dynamic motion of the a Creation Idea. ‘Division of gravity’ means that the motion about the central hub/shaft is not symmetrical. The motion thus wobbles as the orbit has more elliptical rather than circular character. In short, all the loops circulating this wire have the SAME focal centre (red). They circulate perfectly balanced as man might design into a rotary engine.

Tip 3
If one were asked to wind an electrical coil to create a tornado one would almost always wind a coil as indicated by the blue copper windings. Man tends to repeat what he senses, in this case sees. One can be easily mislead by one’s sensing apparatus as the illusion creation by perspective highlights.

Natures tornado’s are 100% E-field, they have NO magnetic component !

If you would but ‘see’ the tornado as a FIELD vortex rather than the geometry for the copper winding then you will understand the necessity to re-think how man should imitate Nature. In short, you want the FIELD effects to look like the hurricane not the electrical wiring.
When Viktor Schauberger desired to create a vortex in the log plume he designed the structure to impart the correct motion TO THE WATER. Man fails in his attempts to harness Nature because he designs with his senses and applies the desired spiral motion to the windings and not the FIELD. The tornado above is a spinning FIELD.

Fig : 6

Fig : 6 Man runs his winding in an E/W direction, that philosophy must change to run the windings in a N/S direction. When the loops are aligned correctly there is NO magnetic character evident (100% E-field)

Fig : 6 highlights the first major error of coil design almost every electrical engineer including Michael Faraday himself. That error pertains to the orientation of the electric loops of force and hence – CURRENT !  The red spiral lines of fig : 6 are NOT loops of wire rather they are the loops of force themselves. These loops have large central holes at the base, but very small central holes at the apex, The loops of force are therefore  perpendicular to the N/S axis. The wires (if any) should run from N/S. It might help you to think of fig : 6 as representing a high tension CRT. There are no wires connecting the anode/cathode inside the tube, yet the loops appear ! Nature doe not use wiring, so how should man change his thinking and copy Nature ?
All too often the spiral geometry indicated in fig : 6 is believed to represent the windings of copper wire. This is a grave error. Because of this simple misunderstanding, man has for hundreds of years orientated the current carrying wire at a tangent to that of the direction of the N/S division.
Fig : 6 clearly shows (in red) where and how man’s electric loops of force should be located and orientated.

Fig : 7
sections A + B

Fig : 7 (a+b) Man applies spiral geometry to his WINDINGS when… … he should construct coils to impart spiral geometry to the FIELD When man’s loop orientation fights that of Nature, a B-field becomes evident.

Fig : 7 clarifies how when man adopts spiral geometry in winding his coils, the loops of force thus generated are not in alignment with the orientation required by Nature. Man should therefore realign his loops to parallel those of Mind Thinking. In short, Nature will always try to keep the E-field undivided to manifest 100% electric force.  Man should copy this technique.

Fig : 7 (part a) indicates clearly that the spiral geometry are LOOPS of force and should not be confused with copper windings.
A cone base means a loop with a large central hole. An apex means a loops with a small central hole. The dimension of the central hole is directly proportional to the degree of concentrative Thinking applied to the condition. Weak concentrative Thinking manifests as the nebulous, cone base, cathode expression, while strong concentrative Thinking manifests as the compressed, apex, anode aspect.

To produce loops in the correct orientation as indicated in fig : 7 (a), the wire must be run N/S from the base to the apex !

The loops generated by MAN due to his winding errors (fig : 7b) become what he believes to be is a separate force manifesting as the magnetic field, the B-field. The emergence of a B-field is a sign of imbalance. When the undivided E-field (fig : 6) is forced to express itself as an E-field and a B-field component (fig : 7b), magnetism appears to emerge 90° from the E-field.
The emergence of such a ‘magnetic’ field is an indication of the imbalance, an indicator of man’s imbalance with Nature.
But, this newly emerged B-field is electric and not magnetic. The magnetic experience arises from the 90° offset nature of the divided E-field.

We should reconfigure the loops which circulate around any live wire and realign those loops to be parallel to those indicating the N/S divide. The Cathode (open loop low current)/anode (closed loop very high current). In this way the losses to the magnetic field are recovered and the electric output is returned to 100% E-field. Remove the 90° offset between the magnetic/electric fields are align them both in the same direction. This will realign the wasted B-field and combine it with the original E-field (fig : 6) thus boosting (E-field x 2) the output as Nature would do it.
There is no B-field associated with this tornado motion, because the loops are aligned perpendicular to the N/S directional axis.

Marko Rodin has done some fantastic work developing toroidal coils as well as the vortex mathematical principles to accompany his theory. A typical coil of his design is shown here, whereby the coil windings follow a spiral geometry. It is my understanding that in order to produce WRC type centripetal/centrifugal motion of the field, it is necessary to impart this  geometry to the field with the coils being aligned to produce this field geometry. This might need to be achieved without wires !


Fig : 8

Running the current carrying wire from the cathode to anode follows more closely the tornado principle. It also matches the loop orientation of fig : 6.
This conical model is completely in tune with the brook/reservoir model taught by WR, whereby  meandering streams and brooks will accumulate potential/time if collected in a reservoir. The speed of the cathode brook is low, while the torque is high. Whereas, the speed of the anode reservoir is mighty due to the accumulated time dimension although its torque is low.
Small thin wires are used towards the cathode base to simulate the many tiny streams feeding into the larger river/reservoir. As the coil is assembled towards the anode, the wires become fewer but thicker to facilitate the accumulated potential/current. This wire assembly will facilitate their loops of force to turn at 90° to the N/S axis exactly as Nature does it !

Those loops will therefore be contained within the conical shape indicated in fig : 8. This will essentially realign the B-field and pull it back into alignment with Nature’s E-field, so that both fields will run from cathode to anode to maximise the E-effect. This effect alone will increase the voltage/current over conventional circuit designs. In order for the loops of force to have the correct orientation the copper windings must run parallel to the N/S axis and NOT looped around this N/S shaft. Winding copper wire around the desired N/S axis will distort those loops of force so they are not longer perpendicular to the N/S axis.
Fig : 8 – Running the current carrying wire from the cathode to anode follows more closely the tornado principle, but it does NOT have to be achieved with WIRES !!!

The Optical Dynamo Generator

The clue is in the name. This is a proposed device rather than an actual device developed by WR. The principle is to use sun light as the incident beam and through an array (4) of optical lenses increase the magnification in cubic ratio. This could
potentially generate temperatures in excess of 4096°C. WR did not pursue this particular option due to the difficulty in finding suitably skilled lens makers.
WR suggests that lenses is the optimal way to design such a device because the multiplying power of any lens is contained within dimensions of the lens itself. The same effect is difficult to achieve with wires because the effect becomes weaker with multiple layers.

Tip 4
When a solenoid is wound, it will have a uniform coil diameter. There is no multiplication involved. Nature on the other hand, creates conical fields which do indeed multiply her efforts.

Modern technology has also refined solar collection with parabolic arrays, tracking the sun and use of highly efficient heat transfer media. This option for the generation of heat can only apply to sun rich latitudes. Though there is no reason this source could not be harnessed for the benefit of all mankind.

Electric coils version of the ‘optical dynamo’ already exist in man’s arsenal. Electrostatic lenses (Einzel Lens) and magnetic lenses are use at CERN to focus an electron beam into very sharp focus.
WR himself struggled a great deal when he attempted to develop a electric device based on the option dynamo. This goal remains elusive to this day  !
We must also pay close attention to the anatomy of the simple cathode ray tube. Under high potential pressure, loops of force are generated with the correct orientation between the high tension anode/cathode nodes. No wires are used. Could such a device be developed which also divided gravity, causing the loops to spin and compress ?

Design Proposal

What are we trying to achieve ?

  • impart motion into the field
  • couple the loops of force surrounding a current carrying wire to the field at the center of the coil

Consider the following.

We know there is a 90° offset between the so called electric and magnetic effects. Our intention should be to set the FIELD in motion to create a tornado which will manifest as a hot, dense condition within the apex of the field cone. It is my understanding that such a device should capture 100% E-field and NOT split the available energy in a 50:50 E/B field.

Coils types :

1) Coils to generate heat. This technique utilises the multiplication/transformer principles to raise the input from 1 to 4000.
2) Coils to generate electricity. This technique will introduce spin rather than heat so that electric current can be extracted.
3) Coils to unwind voided conditions. Water and salt (NaCl) are voided conditions. The technique will unbalance these conditions to liberate hydrogen from the water, and separate salt from sea water.
4) Coils to transmute, Cu to Ag to Au or techniques to unfold an element from the appropriate inert gas.

If Tesla and Russell are correct about the loops of force being much more important than first thought, consider the following design strategy.

Loop Density

+1 divided condition

Can we define a high voltage condition as one whereby there is a high loop density about the current carrying wire ?
These loops are so compressed (face to face as in fig : 4) that they behave like clutch plates. This would enable any slight rotation in one loop to be efficiently transferred to all loops. Conversely, a low voltage condition would then be defined as a condition whereby the loop density was low. Transfer of motion between loops would be poor, slippage would be high and the result would manifest as a small measurable potential difference.
We could also say, that a high loop density may be described as a high loop frequency and copper facilitates a high loop density. Wood on the other hand being an insulator, does not promote a high loop density about its surface.

Constant Loop Diameter

It is my present understanding that a constant/static loop diameter is not a desirable property to harness Nature. A constant loop diameter implies that all circulating loops rotate about the same focal N/S shaft. Let’s consider what happens during the division process to see if we can applied a new thinking to utilise a divided gravity (N/S) shaft. Without being able to alter the loop diameter we will not be able to multiply our electrical effects as Nature does. All throughout the biological world we can find examples of sphincter type motion, whereby a outside pulsing effect can cause motion or the appearance of motion on the inside.
We can appreciate that the radii in the undivided condition are of equal length and there is only one focal point at the central hub. If this symmetrical condition was now divided by compressing the E/W poles the radii become unequal in length.
This is in effect like having two horizontal (x-axis) about which to rotate. This is what to divide gravity means. How should we now best cause such a division and is this the optimal geometry ?

If the image above represents a +1 condition, then the same effect may be achieved with circular rather than elliptical geometry. Using two circular coils off-set in a cam geometry may now offer a real alternative coil design

Positive or Negative Design

Mankind tends to rely completely on his senses to inform him of the world around him. While this is in general good practice, this reliance can lead to serious problems when observations along are applied to explain how the cosmos works !
I have attempted to show that we as a species have missed a trick when designing solenoids and other electrical devices. We are lead too much by out observations.
Make electrical coils cylindrical/spiral by winding copper wire where the loops of force should go is a case in point.
What if we needed to design a device with arbitrary properties and characteristics which were described by the letter H ?
In general, we would set off and build a device which ‘looked’ like the letter H. It is my understanding that WR knew though perhaps didn’t explain with sufficient clarity that we should design the physical device in reverse and generate the characteristic of the letter H in the Field.

Consider the following, rather than constructing the physical device to look identical to the black letter H, build the device to look like the white reverse image. In this way the positive Field (H) is generated.
We need to think of our physical device acting like a mold or die to produce the correct geometry within the Field and not within the device itself.

Design for Wobble

Let us consider this device designed by WR. It is important to realise this is not an example of poor draughtsmanship. The central rotor appears not to have straight flat faces. There is an obvious ‘gap’ between the rotor faces and those of the stator. Why ?
The central rotor will of course rotate smoothly on its bearings, but field experienced by the rotating hub will vary and wobble.